ArticleDepression and anxiety2024
Validation of the Paykel Suicide Scale and the Plutchik Suicide Risk Scale in Spanish Women during the Perinatal Period.
Article in Depression and anxiety, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mental Health in Spanish Veterinarians: Emotional Exhaustion, Affective Symptomatology, and Suicidal Ideation.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2026Article
- Perceived control and support during childbirth and their association with postpartum mental health outcomes: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Association between self-esteem and suicide risk in adolescents from five schools in northern Peru: A cross-sectional study.Global mental health (Cambridge, England) · 2026Article
- Predictive models of suicidal ideation risk in perinatal-stage women based on sociodemographic and clinical data.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Prevalence and associated factors of anxiety in postpartum women.European journal of midwifery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: No specific instruments are available to detect the risk of suicide in women during the perinatal period. Suicide in perinatal women is little studied despite being one of the main causes of maternal mortality. Its prevalence has increased by 100% in the United States in a decade. Moreover, it has consequences for the mother and the newborn. Objective: To validate the Paykel Suicide Scale and the Plutchik Suicide Risk Scale in Spanish women during the perinatal period. Materials and Methods: Cross-sectional study with Spanish women who were pregnant or who had given birth less than 18 months ago. Information was collected on sociodemographic variables, obstetric variables, and the newborn. A questionnaire that included both suicide scales and the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EDPS) was used. An exploratory factor analysis (EFA), convergent and criterion validation, as well as internal consistency analysis, were performed. Results: In total, 237 women participated. The EFA determined that in the Plutchik Suicide Risk Scale 4 components explained 54.8% of the variance, while in the Paykel Scale, a single component explained 53.0% of the variance. In the convergent validity, the risk of suicide or suicidal ideation was related to the Plutchik Suicide Risk Scale and the Paykel Suicide Scale, respectively, with the variables: perception of low social support, risk of intimate partner violence, level of anxiety, history of mental pathology, and having experienced a stressful event in the last year, among others ( Conclusion: Both scales presented adequate psychometric characteristics to be used as a screening instrument for suicide risk in Spanish women in the perinatal period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.