ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
Effectiveness of early intervention and combination treatment with monoclonal antibodies and antivirals in oncohematological patients with SARS-CoV-2: a retrospective experience.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients with acute SARS-CoV-2 and pre-existing oncohematological conditions challenge clinicians due to a heightened risk for severe COVID-19 and forced deferral of cancer treatment. Different treatment approaches aim to either prevent the progression of mild disease ("early therapy") or to treat more severe COVID-19. Currently, there is limited evidence supporting the effectiveness of a tailored approach for oncohematological patients. We present a real-world experience from two university hospitals. In this retrospective study we recruited oncohematological patients hospitalized for SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia between March 2020 and June 2023 from two hospitals in Latium, Italy. Patients with COVID-19 pneumonia received either antiviral or monoclonal antibodies (MoAb) alone, a dual therapy (antiviral with MoAb) or a triple therapy (two different antivirals and MoAb). The study aimed to evaluate the practical management of hospitalized oncohematological patients with COVID-19. We focused on the impact in patients with COVID-19 related pneumonia of specific therapies, early treatment, and tixagevimab-cilgavimab prophylaxis on in-hospital mortality and viral clearance time. Overall, 101 patients were recruited, 76 (75.24%) patients developed pneumonia, and 16 (15.84%) patients died from any cause. While most patients (75,25%) did not receive "early therapy", those who did had a higher chance of survival (p=0.04). Furthermore, the pneumonia subgroup treated with early therapy demonstrated a higher survival rate as well (p=0.02). Out of the hospitalized patients triple therapy resulted in lower mortality (all patients survive in this group). This group also showed a significant reduction in the time to viral clearance from the first day of the evaluated therapy (6 days [IQR 4;9]), compared to patients treated with only remdesivir (17 days [IQR 8;37]) (p=0.03). Our findings demonstrate that early therapy significantly reduces in-hospital mortality, while triple therapy accelerates viral clearance in hospitalized patients. These results, in line with recent studies, underscore the critical importance of prompt treatment and a multitargeted pharmacological approach for optimizing outcomes in oncohematological patients with SARS-CoV-2. Future research, involving larger cohorts, should delve deeper into COVID-19 treatment strategies for this vulnerable population, with a particular emphasis on the elderly, who continue to experience high mortality rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.