Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40226578›Full record

ArticlePerspectives on medical education2025

Co-Designing a Justice-Oriented Assessment System in a Pediatric Residency Program: Report from the Designing for Equity in Medical Education Project.

Hannah Kakara Anderson, Pricilla Cabral, Emma Gerstenzang, Christine Liverpool, Marciel Gonzalez, Anna Weiss, Danielle Cullen, Dorene Balmer, Marjan Govaerts, Daniel C West and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Perspectives on medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Hannah Kakara AndersonUniversity of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, US.ORCID 0000-0002-9435-1535
Pricilla CabralThe Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, US.
Emma GerstenzangThe Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, US.ORCID 0000-0002-4674-7754
Christine LiverpoolThe Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, US.
Marciel GonzalezThe Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, US.
Anna WeissThe Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, US.ORCID 0000-0002-6631-3515
Danielle CullenThe Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, US.ORCID 0000-0003-2606-2624
Dorene BalmerThe Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, US.ORCID 0000-0001-6805-4062
Marjan GovaertsMaastricht University School of Health Professions Education, NL.ORCID 0000-0003-3742-0781
Daniel C WestThe Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, US.ORCID 0000-0002-0909-4213
Jamiu BusariMaastricht University School of Health Professions Education, NL.ORCID 0000-0002-8616-5564

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Need for Innovation: There is a large body of evidence that assessment systems in medical education are inequitable for many groups of learners. A common approach to improve equity has been the use of organizational strategies, where training program leaders work to develop and implement improvements in existing assessment systems from their perspective to improve equity. However, emerging assessment approaches, such as justice-oriented assessment, argue that assessment systems must be made more equitable by critique and re-building through co-design with learners, assessors, and other key users. Little is known about how to apply these methods to workplace-based assessment in medical education. Goal of Innovation: To fill the knowledge gap about how to co-design a more equitable, justice-oriented, workplace-based assessment system in pediatric post-graduate medical education. Steps taken for Development and Implementation of innovation: Using the Design Justice framework, the authors completed 4 of the 5 phases of Design Thinking to co-design with learners and other users a workplace-based assessment system in their institution's pediatric residency program. Evaluation of Innovation: To understand whether and how Design Justice principles were present and operationalized in the process of co-designing the assessment system, the authors evaluated the design activities in each phase of the Design Thinking process, the outputs of the design process, and the experiences of participating users. Critical Reflection: Evidence of Design Justice principles included participants' feelings of being heard, affirmed, and empowered, as well as the design teams' iterative, critical reflection on making the project accessible, accountable, sustainable, and collaborative. This project offers a practical example of co-designing a justice-oriented assessment system, the process and principles of which can inform the efforts of advancing equity in assessment.

Indexed as

Educational MeasurementInternship and ResidencyPediatricsSocial JusticeHumans

Identifiers

PMID40226578
PMCPMC11987879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.