Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40226544›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2025

Unveiling the potentials of

Nantikan Joyroy, Lukana Ngiwsara, Siriporn Wannachat, Ratchanee Mingma, Jisnuson Svasti, Jintanart Wongchawalit

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nantikan JoyroyDepartment of Science and Bioinnovation, Faculty of Liberal Arts and Sciences, Kasetsart University, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand.
Lukana NgiwsaraLaboratory of Biochemistry, Chulaborn Research Institute, Chulaborn Research Institute, Bangkok, Thailand.
Siriporn WannachatDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Agricullture at Kamphaeng Saen, Kasetsart University, Kamphaeng Saen, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand.
Ratchanee MingmaDepartment of Science and Bioinnovation, Faculty of Liberal Arts and Sciences, Kasetsart University, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand.
Jisnuson SvastiLaboratory of Biochemistry, Chulaborn Research Institute, Chulaborn Research Institute, Bangkok, Thailand.
Jintanart WongchawalitDepartment of Science and Bioinnovation, Faculty of Liberal Arts and Sciences, Kasetsart University, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Methods: Results: Quantitative analysis revealed that HenE and HenM extracts had high phenolic and flavonoid contents. Gallic acid, catechin, ellagic acid, apigetrin, lawsone and quercetin were identified by HPLC. The HenE and HenM extracts exhibited strong antioxidant properties, and the extracts showed different inhibition growth against bacteria tested, especially Discussion and Conclusion: This study revealed that the

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicAntioxidantsLawsonia PlantPlant ExtractsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCell Line, TumorFlavonoidsHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPhytochemicalsPlant LeavesAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective AgentsAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicAntioxidantsFlavonoidsPhytochemicalsPlant ExtractsAntimicrobial activityAnti-migration abilityAntioxidant activityCytotoxicityLawsonia inermisPhytochemicals

Identifiers

PMID40226544
PMCPMC11992976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.