ArticleChina CDC weekly2025
Current Status and Factors of Vaccine Hesitancy in Tetanus Vaccination Among Traumatic Patients - China, 2024.
Article in China CDC weekly, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Factors associated with willingness to receive an adult tetanus booster in China: A cross-sectional study incorporating behavioral factor analysis.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2026Article
- Vaccine Hesitancy Among Caregivers in China: Associations of Misinterpreted AEFI, Compensation Awareness, and Institutional Trust.Vaccines · 2026Article
- Article
- Behavioural and service-context correlates of tetanus vaccination intention after trauma exposure in China: a cross-sectional BeSD study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Influencing factors and enhancement strategies for vaccination behavior among Chinese residents: an empirical analysis based on a nationwide survey.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
What is already known about this topic?: The incidence of tetanus in China remains significantly higher than in economically developed regions. Tetanus vaccination represents the most scientifically validated and efficient approach to tetanus prevention. However, vaccine hesitancy presents substantial barriers to the widespread implementation of non-neonatal tetanus vaccination programs across China. What is added by this report?: This study constitutes the first comprehensive investigation of tetanus vaccine hesitancy in China, documenting its current prevalence and underlying determinants. Findings reveal that limited knowledge about tetanus vaccines, complacency regarding tetanus risk, advanced age, and other factors significantly contribute to vaccination hesitancy. The research demonstrates that medical institutions and healthcare providers offering evidence-based information about tetanus prevention may substantially enhance vaccination uptake. What are the implications for public health practice?: By elucidating the specific reasons for tetanus vaccine refusal among trauma patients, this study provides critical insights for government agencies and health policymakers to develop contextually appropriate interventions aligned with China's national circumstances, ultimately facilitating improved tetanus vaccination coverage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.