Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40226471›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2025

Development and validation of a Nomogram to predict postoperative flap necrosis risk in breast cancer patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy.

Yi Peng, Xin Zhang, Jianbin Wu, Hongmei Wang, Xiaoxi Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yi PengDepartment of Breast Surgery, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital Fuzhou 350001, Fujian, China.
Xin ZhangDepartment of Breast Surgery, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital Fuzhou 350001, Fujian, China.
Jianbin WuDepartment of Breast Surgery, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital Fuzhou 350001, Fujian, China.
Hongmei WangDepartment of Breast Surgery, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital Fuzhou 350001, Fujian, China.
Xiaoxi HuangDepartment of Breast Surgery, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital Fuzhou 350001, Fujian, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFlap necrosis is a critical complication following modified radical mastectomy (MRM) for breast cancer (BC). It not only impairs wound healing but also delays postoperative treatment, adversely affecting patient survival rate and the overall quality of life. Thus, developing an accurate prediction model is crucial for early intervention and improving patient prognosis.

objectiveTo develop and validate a Nomogram model based on Logistic regression to assess the risk of postoperative flap necrosis in BC patients undergoing MRM.

methodsA retrospective study was conducted on 605 BC patients who underwent MRM. These patients were stratified into a training group (n=406) and a validation group (n=199) in a 33:67 ratio. Univariate and multivariate Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors for flap necrosis, and a Nomogram prediction model was subsequently constructed. The model's discriminatory power (assessed via the receiver operating characteristic [ROC] curve), calibration accuracy (evaluated by calibration curve), and clinical benefit (analyzed through decision curve analysis) were comprehensively evaluated. Moreover, essential performance metrics such as sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were systematically recorded and analyzed.

resultsNine independent risk factors were identified, including age, body mass index (BMI), neutrophil count, hemoglobin level, drainage volume on the third postoperative day, axillary lymph node metastasis (ALNM), surgical duration, intraoperative bleeding volume, and drainage duration. The area under the curve (AUC) of the Nomogram model was 0.898 in the training group and 0.886 in the validation group, indicating good discriminatory capacity. Calibration curves demonstrated good agreement between predicted values and actual values, with P-values for goodness-of-fit of 0.1761 (training) and 0.0648 (validation), respectively. Decision curve analysis revealed significant clinical benefits, with maximum benefit rates of 76.84% (training) and 80.40% (validation), respectively.

conclusionThe Nomogram model developed in this study accurately predicts flap necrosis risk in BC patients post-MRM, offering significant clinical utility for risk management and improved patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Breast cancerflap necrosislogistic regressionmodified radical mastectomyNomogram

Identifiers

PMID40226471
PMCPMC11982728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.