ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2025
Efficacy and influencing factors of immunotherapy crossover combined with targeted therapy in advanced esophageal cancer patients following first-line chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy failure.
Article in American journal of cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdvanced esophageal cancer presents significant treatment challenges, especially after immunochemotherapy failure. This study evaluates the efficacy of further treatment with combination chemotherapy versus combination immunotherapy crossover in terms of tumor regression, quality of life, and identifies factors influencing treatment outcomes.
methodsIn a retrospective case-control study, clinical data from 293 patients with advanced esophageal cancer treated at Shanxi Province Cancer Hospital between February 2021 and February 2023 were analyzed. Patients excluded from radical resection due to failure of first-line immunotherapy were divided into two groups: 95 received combination chemotherapy with Irinotecan and Tigio (S-1, Tegafur/Gimeracil/Oteracil Potassium), and 198 underwent Anlotinib targeted therapy combined with immunotherapy crossover. Treatment efficacy was assessed using tumor regression grading (TRG), and quality of life was evaluated using EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-OES18 scales. Potential factors affecting treatment efficacy were examined using multivariate logistic regression analysis.
resultsBaseline characteristics, including age, gender, body mass index (BMI), and history of smoking and alcohol consumption, were comparable between the two groups. TRG showed no significant differences in distribution, with objective response rates of 40% in the Irinotecan/S-1 group and 44.44% in the combined immunotherapy crossover group (P = 0.472). However, quality of life measures indicated superior outcomes from immunotherapy crossover in physical (P = 0.024), emotional (P = 0.002), and general health scores (P = 0.003). Factors negatively impacting treatment success included male gender, smoking, alcohol consumption history, and certain tumor locations. Elevated CEA levels positively correlated with treatment efficacy. Logistic regression analysis identified male gender (OR, 2.109; P = 0.021), smoking (OR, 2.575; P = 0.003), alcohol consumption (OR, 1.995; P = 0.043), and CEA levels (OR, 0.742; P = 0.017) as significant predictors of treatment efficacy.
conclusionImmunotherapy combined with targeted therapy and chemotherapy alone showed comparable efficacy in tumor regression. However, immunotherapy combined with targeted therapy improved certain aspects of quality of life. Factors such as gender, lifestyle habits, and CEA levels can significantly influence treatment outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.