ArticleClinical kidney journal2025
Prognosis of non-albuminuric patients with the cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome.
Article in Clinical kidney journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A machine learning-derived aging index for risk stratification and mortality prediction in cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome: A retrospective cohort study.PLoS medicine · 2026Article
- Refining the Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic Staging System for Improved Risk Stratification of Chronic Kidney Disease Progression in Type 2 Diabetes.Circulation reports · 2026Article
- Sex differences in the prognostic value of urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio for coronary artery disease and cardiovascular events in people with type 2 diabetes and normoalbuminuria.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic (CKM) syndrome affects a significant portion of the general population. Urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) is an important indicator of kidney injury. While some studies have indicated associations between UACR within the normal range and mortality outcomes, it remains uncertain whether traditionally normal UACR could help to distinguish the prognosis of CKM patients. Methods: This cohort study included patients with CKM syndrome at stages 2 and 3 and traditionally normal UACR from the China Renal Data System (CRDS) and UK Biobank (UKB) databases. UACR was treated as a continuous variable and categorized into low-normal and high-normal. The associations were initially assessed in the CRDS database and subsequently validated in the UKB database. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was employed to estimate the associations with UACR. Additionally, subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses were conducted to enhance the robustness of the results. Results: The study encompassed a total of 14 602 patients from the CRDS database and 82 694 patients from the UKB database. Near-linear associations were identified between continuous UACR levels and progression to CKM stage 4, as well as all-cause mortality. When compared with the low-normal UACR group, individuals with high-normal UACR exhibited an elevated risk of progression to CKM stage 4 (HR 1.133, 95% CI 1.026-1.250) and increased all-cause mortality (HR 2.321, 95% CI 1.679-3.208) within the CRDS database. These associations were further corroborated in the UKB database. Consistent findings were also observed through subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses. Conclusions: The findings indicate that elevated UACR levels within the normal range are significantly associated with poor prognosis among CKM patients at stages 2 and 3. These results underscore the critical role of UACR in identifying high-risk populations, particularly among individuals with metabolic disorders. This information may prove valuable for monitoring and implementing risk intervention strategies for CKM patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.