ArticleEuropean journal of radiology open2025
Assessment of bone-implant interface image quality for in-vivo acetabular cup implants using photon-counting detector CT: Impact of tin pre-filtration.
Article in European journal of radiology open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Current Uses for Medical Imaging With Orthopaedic Implant Technology.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To assess the image quality of the bone-implant interface of acetabular cup implants using photon-counting detector (PCD) CT with and without tin pre-filtration in a clinical setting. Methods and materials: Twenty-four patients underwent PCD-CT imaging of their total hip replacement (THR). Twelve patients were scanned using 140 kVp and twelve patients using 140 kVp with tin pre-filtration (Sn140 kVp). All scans were acquired with a collimation of 120 × 0.2 mm. The acquired data was reconstructed with different slice thickness (0.2 mm - 0.6 mm) and kernel (Qr) strengths (56, 76, 89) with and without metal artifact reduction (iMAR). Two observers assessed the image quality of the bone-implant interface for the cup based on four image quality criteria. Bone contrast, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of bone/fat and cortical sharpness was performed as quantitative measures. Results: Image quality was rated highest for 0.2 mm slice thickness and Qr89 kernel across all four criteria for both the 140 kVp and Sn140 kVp by both observers, with a slight preference for the Sn140kVp over the 140 kVp. In all cases and for all image criteria the 0.2 mm/Qr89 was preferred above the Qr76 and Qr56/iMAR for both the 140 kVp and Sn140 kVp by both observers. Quantitative measurements confirmed significantly improved bone contrast as well as cortical sharpness using 0.2 mm/Qr89. Tin pre-filtration did not affect the CNR at 0.2 mm/Qr89 but tended to decrease cortical sharpness. Conclusions: High resolution PCD-CT allows for in-vivo assessment of the bone-implant interface in patients with THR and is preferably acquired with tin pre-filtration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.