Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40226312›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of radiology open2025

Assessment of bone-implant interface image quality for in-vivo acetabular cup implants using photon-counting detector CT: Impact of tin pre-filtration.

Ronald Booij, Pauline de Klerk, Erik Tesselaar, Mischa Woisetschläger, Anne Brandts, Mariëlle Olsthoorn, Jakob van Oldenrijk, Koen Bos, Jörg Schilcher, Edwin H G Oei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of radiology open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Current Uses for Medical Imaging With Orthopaedic Implant Technology.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ronald BooijDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Pauline de KlerkDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Erik TesselaarCenter for Medical Image Science and Visualization (CMIV), Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Mischa WoisetschlägerCenter for Medical Image Science and Visualization (CMIV), Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Anne BrandtsDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Mariëlle OlsthoornDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Jakob van OldenrijkDepartment of Orthopedics and Sportsmedicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Koen BosDepartment of Orthopedics and Sportsmedicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Jörg SchilcherCenter for Medical Image Science and Visualization (CMIV), Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Edwin H G OeiDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the image quality of the bone-implant interface of acetabular cup implants using photon-counting detector (PCD) CT with and without tin pre-filtration in a clinical setting. Methods and materials: Twenty-four patients underwent PCD-CT imaging of their total hip replacement (THR). Twelve patients were scanned using 140 kVp and twelve patients using 140 kVp with tin pre-filtration (Sn140 kVp). All scans were acquired with a collimation of 120 × 0.2 mm. The acquired data was reconstructed with different slice thickness (0.2 mm - 0.6 mm) and kernel (Qr) strengths (56, 76, 89) with and without metal artifact reduction (iMAR). Two observers assessed the image quality of the bone-implant interface for the cup based on four image quality criteria. Bone contrast, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of bone/fat and cortical sharpness was performed as quantitative measures. Results: Image quality was rated highest for 0.2 mm slice thickness and Qr89 kernel across all four criteria for both the 140 kVp and Sn140 kVp by both observers, with a slight preference for the Sn140kVp over the 140 kVp. In all cases and for all image criteria the 0.2 mm/Qr89 was preferred above the Qr76 and Qr56/iMAR for both the 140 kVp and Sn140 kVp by both observers. Quantitative measurements confirmed significantly improved bone contrast as well as cortical sharpness using 0.2 mm/Qr89. Tin pre-filtration did not affect the CNR at 0.2 mm/Qr89 but tended to decrease cortical sharpness. Conclusions: High resolution PCD-CT allows for in-vivo assessment of the bone-implant interface in patients with THR and is preferably acquired with tin pre-filtration.

Indexed as

ArthroplastyImage qualityOrthopedic ImplantsOsseointegrationPhoton-counting detector CT-Tomography (x-ray computed)

Identifiers

PMID40226312
PMCPMC11986979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.