Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40226302›Full record

ReviewMatrix biology plus2025

Crosstalk between T cells and fibroblasts in biomaterial-mediated fibrosis.

Mathew Kibet, Daniel Abebayehu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Matrix biology plus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mathew KibetDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering and Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, United States.
Daniel AbebayehuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering and Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, United States.

Funding

Immuno-stromal axes regulate fibroblast heterogeneity in tissue fibrosis and regenerationR00GM146111 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI ABEBAYEHU, DANIEL · 2023 to 2024
$498k
NIGMS NIH HHS R00 GM146111
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biomaterial implants are a critical aspect of our medical therapies and biomedical research and come in various forms: stents, implantable glucose sensors, orthopedic implants, silicone implants, drug delivery systems, and tissue engineered scaffolds. Their implantation triggers a series of biological responses that often times lead to the foreign body response and subsequent fibrotic encapsulation, a dense ECM-rich capsule that isolates the biomaterial and renders it ineffective. These responses lead to the failure of biomaterials and is a major hurdle to overcome and in promoting their success. Much attention has been given to macrophage populations for the inflammatory component of these responses to biomaterials but recent work has identified an important role of T cells and their ability to modulate fibroblast activity and vice versa. In this review, we focus on T cell-fibroblast crosstalk by exploring T cell subsets, critical signaling pathways, and fibroblast populations that have been shown to dictate biomaterial-mediated fibrosis. We then highlight emerging technologies and model systems that enable new insights and avenues to T cell-fibroblast crosstalk that will improve biomaterial outcomes.

Identifiers

PMID40226302
PMCPMC11986236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.