ArticleAntimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE2025
Can we rely on artificial intelligence to guide antimicrobial therapy? A systematic literature review.
Article in Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Large language models in the diagnosis and treatment of immunosuppression-related infections in rheumatic diseases: a comparative, vignette-based study.Rheumatology international · 2026Article
- Comparison of OneChoice AI-Based Clinical Decision Support Recommendations with Infectious Disease Specialists and Non-Specialists for Empirical Urinary Tract Infection Therapy in Lima, Peru.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Do large language models differ in their pharmacology-related response quality for oral and maxillofacial surgery? a blinded expert benchmark study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Machine learning-driven decision support for antibiotic optimization in typhoid fever based on patient profiles.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Large Language Models for Clinical Narrative Processing: Methods, Applications, and Challenges.Methods and protocols · 2026Article
- Review
- eBIMIC: development of a web platform for real-time access to cumulative antimicrobial susceptibility reports and its potential impact on evidence-based antibiotic prescribing in bacteremia.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence applications in biofilm research: computational approaches for biofilm analysis and antimicrobial prediction.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Observational
- Antimicrobial Resistance: The Answers.British journal of biomedical science · 2026Review
- Exploring opportunities to improve health equity with machine learning and artificial intelligence in healthcare epidemiology.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2026Review
- Evolution of technology and disparities in antimicrobial stewardship: a narrative review.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2026Review
- Role of artificial intelligence in ICU therapeutic decision-making for severe infections.Current opinion in critical care · 2025Review
- Transforming sepsis management: AI-driven innovations in early detection and tailored therapies.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Review
- R.I.S.E. ID: Adaptations to the Current Political Climate for the Infectious Diseases Frontline.Open forum infectious diseases · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to enhance clinical decision-making, including in infectious diseases. By improving antimicrobial resistance prediction and optimizing antibiotic prescriptions, these technologies may support treatment strategies and address critical gaps in healthcare. This study evaluates the effectiveness of AI in guiding appropriate antibiotic prescriptions for infectious diseases through a systematic literature review. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of studies evaluating AI (machine learning or large language models) used for guidance on prescribing appropriate antibiotics in infectious disease cases. Searches were performed in PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for articles published up to October 25, 2024. Inclusion criteria focused on studies assessing the performance of AI in clinical practice, with outcomes related to antimicrobial management and decision-making. Results: Seventeen studies used machine learning as part of clinical decision support systems (CDSS). They improved prediction of antimicrobial resistance and optimized antimicrobial use. Six studies focused on large language models to guide antimicrobial therapy; they had higher prescribing error rates, patient safety risks, and needed precise prompts to ensure accurate responses. Conclusions: AI, particularly machine learning integrated into CDSS, holds promise in enhancing clinical decision-making and improving antimicrobial management. However, large language models currently lack the reliability required for complex clinical applications. The indispensable role of infectious disease specialists remains critical for ensuring accurate, personalized, and safe treatment strategies. Rigorous validation and regular updates are essential before the successful integration of AI into clinical practice.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.