Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40226293›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE2025

Can we rely on artificial intelligence to guide antimicrobial therapy? A systematic literature review.

Sulwan AlGain, Alexandre R Marra, Takaaki Kobayashi, Pedro S Marra, Patricia Deffune Celeghini, Mariana Kim Hsieh, Mohammed Abdu Shatari, Samiyah Althagafi, Maria Alayed, Jamila I Ranavaya and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. eBIMIC: development of a web platform for real-time access to cumulative antimicrobial susceptibility reports and its potential impact on evidence-based antibiotic prescribing in bacteremia.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Antimicrobial Resistance: The Answers.British journal of biomedical science · 2026
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Evolution of technology and disparities in antimicrobial stewardship: a narrative review.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2026
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Sulwan AlGainKing Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-7116-9597
Alexandre R MarraHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7577-7688
Takaaki KobayashiUniversity of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4751-6859
Pedro S MarraSchool of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7171-2169
Patricia Deffune CeleghiniHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Mariana Kim HsiehUniversity of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8709-5484
Mohammed Abdu ShatariKing Saud Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Samiyah AlthagafiPediatric Infectious Diseases, King Abdullah Specialized Children's Hospital, MNGHA, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Maria AlayedKing Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Jamila I RanavayaDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Nicole A BoodhooDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Iowa College of Public Health, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Nicholas O MeadeDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Daniel FuPritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5714-5820
Mindy Marie SampsonDivision of Infectious Diseases & Geographic Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5724-5875
Guillermo Rodriguez-NavaDivision of Infectious Diseases & Geographic Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9826-7050
Alex N ZimmetDivision of Infectious Diseases & Geographic Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3337-0043
David HaDivision of Infectious Diseases & Geographic Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4912-5827
Mohammed AlsuhaibaniKing Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Boglarka S HuddlestonLane Medical Library, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7843-5632
Jorge L SalinasDivision of Infectious Diseases & Geographic Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to enhance clinical decision-making, including in infectious diseases. By improving antimicrobial resistance prediction and optimizing antibiotic prescriptions, these technologies may support treatment strategies and address critical gaps in healthcare. This study evaluates the effectiveness of AI in guiding appropriate antibiotic prescriptions for infectious diseases through a systematic literature review. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of studies evaluating AI (machine learning or large language models) used for guidance on prescribing appropriate antibiotics in infectious disease cases. Searches were performed in PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for articles published up to October 25, 2024. Inclusion criteria focused on studies assessing the performance of AI in clinical practice, with outcomes related to antimicrobial management and decision-making. Results: Seventeen studies used machine learning as part of clinical decision support systems (CDSS). They improved prediction of antimicrobial resistance and optimized antimicrobial use. Six studies focused on large language models to guide antimicrobial therapy; they had higher prescribing error rates, patient safety risks, and needed precise prompts to ensure accurate responses. Conclusions: AI, particularly machine learning integrated into CDSS, holds promise in enhancing clinical decision-making and improving antimicrobial management. However, large language models currently lack the reliability required for complex clinical applications. The indispensable role of infectious disease specialists remains critical for ensuring accurate, personalized, and safe treatment strategies. Rigorous validation and regular updates are essential before the successful integration of AI into clinical practice.

Identifiers

PMID40226293
PMCPMC11986881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.