ArticleIndian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India2025
Does the Anatomical Relationship Between Maxillary Molar Teeth and Maxillary Sinus Floor Differ Among Subjects with and Without Odontogenic Related Mucosal Thickening? A Cone-Beam Computed Tomographic Survey.
Article in Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Horizontal and vertical position of the maxillary molar roots in relation to the sinus floor was compared between subjects with and without odontogenic related mucosal thickening (MT) using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). CBCT images of 330 subjects were evaluated based on the observation of odontogenic related MT. Moreover, horizontal and vertical position of the maxillary molar roots in relation to the sinus floor was investigated and categorized. Pearson Chi-Square and Fisher's exact tests were used for the statistical comparisons with the significance level set at 0.05. Among the horizontal relationships, "BP" which refers to the lowest point of the sinus floor being positioned between the buccal and palatal roots was the most frequent in the first and second molars. With respect to the vertical relationships, "2b" variant which refers to the root apices being in contact with the sinus floor without its elevation was the most common type. A significant relationship was found between MT and horizontal relation type "B" in the first molars which refers to the lowest point of the sinus floor being positioned on the buccal side of the buccal roots (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.