ArticleHealth science reports2025
The Impact of Malignancy on the Risk of Venous Thromboembolism in Pregnant Women: A Systematic Review.
Article in Health science reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Leukemia during pregnancy and survivorship: gestational age-stratified multidisciplinary management framework.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a distinct malignancy complication that raises the risk of demise in cancer patients by up to thrice. However, pregnant females have a 4-5 times greater chance of getting VTE than nonpregnant women. The current systematic review aimed to elucidate the impact of malignancy on the risk of VTE in pregnant females. Methods: We carried out a systematic search in multiple databases, including PubMed (Medline), Google Scholar, and Scopus, up to January 2023. Finally, 441 related articles were extracted from the databases. After screening the title, abstract, and full text, seven articles were included in the study. Results: Seven studies (six cohorts and one cross-sectional) with 58,854,195 pregnant females (22,396 cancer patients) were included. These studies were done in the United States of America, Canada, Brazil, and Denmark. All of the studies except one study demonstrated that cancer in pregnant patients increased the risk of deep vein thrombosis (DVT). The risk of VTE prevalence in pregnant females with a record of malignancy was significantly higher than in free cancer groups, and the highest aOR was correlated to myeloid leukemia. Conclusions: Evidence in this systematic review showed that pregnant women with malignancy are more susceptible to VTE and other coagulation disorders. Physicians and health policymakers should be of high vigilance to pregnancy-associated VTE, especially in women who have cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.