Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40226146›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Fascial Manual Medicine: The Concept of Fascial Continuum.

Bruno Bordoni, Allan R Escher

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Bruno BordoniPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Foundation Don Carlo Gnocchi, Milan, ITA.
Allan R EscherOncologic Sciences, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fascial tissue ubiquitously pervades the body system, becoming the target of many disciplines that use manual techniques for patient treatment. It is a much-debated topic as there is currently no univocal definition among different authors. Due to the non-discontinuity of the fascia, we can speak of a fascial continuum; this principle is the basis of the osteopathic perspective. This vision, which seems banal, is not always applied in manual fascial medicine, where, often, it is conditioned by a reductionist (layers) and mechanistic (compartments) approach, forgetting that the body is not a machine but an organism. This continuity teaches that manual treatment does not only reverberate in the area where the operator's hands rest but creates a series of local and systemic adaptations. This narrative review revises the concept of the fascial continuum by highlighting that fascia is a tissue system (different tissues working in harmony), multi-organ (capable of behaving like an organ), whose macroscopic functional expression (movement) and microscopic (with cellular adaptations) derives from a nanoscopic coherence (electromagnetic behaviors). This means that the body acts as a unit, and makes the manual approach never local but always systemic. The aim of the article is to highlight the fact that the fascial continuum is a single biological entity (solid and fluid), and that manual fascial medicine does not approach a single segment, but the entire person.

Indexed as

chiropracticfasciafasciaefascintegritymanual therapymyofascialosteopathicosteopathyphysiotherapyquantum biology

Identifiers

PMID40226146
PMCPMC11992952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.