ArticleCureus2025
Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Student Practice in a Surgical Skills Curriculum: A Prospective Study.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Exploring Competency Development Through Simulation-Based Preclinical Training in Veterinary Education.Veterinary sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of student practice in a surgical skills curriculum and their evolution during the process and, therefore, evaluate the relevance of training surgical skills in medical graduation.
methodsThe study design was prospective observational and analytical, the participants were fourth-year medical students from the Bahiana School of Medical Education and Public Health, and the sample size was 300. The sampling method used was a non-probability sampling method, and data collection was realized through a questionnaire in a QR code with a study overview and a pre-assessment and post-assessment survey link. Data analysis was performed using Microsoft Excel 2021 (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA, US). The Shapiro-Wilk test was first conducted to test for normality. Due to the normal distribution of the data, a parametric paired t-test with a 95% confidence interval was used to analyze statistical differences in diagnostic accuracy and knowledge acquisition scores between the pre- and post-assessment and provided the collection of data to assess the impact of a second review moment of surgical skills (SRMSS) for medical students.
resultsPerceived readiness to teach improved across all weeks. Pre- and post-assessment scores showed significant increases (p < 0.05), with mean differences ranging from 0.89 to 1.32, the largest change occurring in Week 1 (1.32). Perceived readiness to apply topics in professional life improved across all weeks, with mean differences ranging from 0.52 to 1.32 (p < 0.05).
conclusionThe results show that the SRMSS implemented over the six-week period were effective in enhancing participants' perceived learning, readiness for assessments, readiness to teach, and readiness to apply learned topics in practical or professional contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.