ArticleIJTLD open2025
Children's preferences among six novel moxifloxacin and linezolid-dispersible tablet formulations.
Article in IJTLD open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Acceptability of 100-mg moxifloxacin in children with rifampicin-resistant TB in three high-burden countries.IJTLD open · 2025Article
- Global child-friendly anti-TB medicines - where do we stand?IJTLD open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMoxifloxacin (MFX) and linezolid (LZD) are key components of rifampicin-resistant TB treatment regimens. Currently, available dispersible tablet formulations of both drugs have poor palatability in children. We evaluated children's preferences for more child-friendly formulations from two generic manufacturers.
methodsThis was a randomised, cross-sectional 'swish-and-spit' taste panel study at two sites in South Africa. Each manufacturer created three flavour-blend variants for each drug. Healthy child volunteers 5-17 years old were sampled stratified by age, sex, and ethnic group and completed a preference rank-ordering and five acceptability 5-point Likert scales. We explored the blends' acceptability using summary, comparative, and ranking statistics.
resultsNinety-seven and 96 children contributed data for the MFX and LZD drug blends, respectively. For both manufacturers' MFX blends, the Friedman test showed children had a statistically significant preference for novel options over the Existing blend (Q(2) = 24,937;
conclusionChildren across a broad age spectrum can provide meaningful input on the palatability preferences of TB drug formulations. Novel MFX formulation blends were recommended for development, but acceptability remains suboptimal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.