Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40226130›Full record

Trial reportDrug design, development and therapy2025

Establishing the Median and 95% Effective Doses of Oliceridine for Immediate Post-Surgical Analgesia Following Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Double-Blind, Sequential Dose-Finding Study.

Xianghua Cao, Huiling Xiao, Haoran Yan, Yujiao Wei, Qiting Wen, Zhijian Zhang, Guizhen Xu, Binbin Xu, Jian Chen, Xueping Li

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Drug design, development and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Xianghua Cao *Department of Anesthesiology, Dongguan Tungwah Hospital, Dongguan, People's Republic of China.
Huiling Xiao *Department of Anesthesiology, Dongguan Tungwah Hospital, Dongguan, People's Republic of China.
Haoran Yan *Department of Anesthesiology, Dongguan Tungwah Hospital, Dongguan, People's Republic of China.
Yujiao WeiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Dongguan Tungwah Hospital, Dongguan, People's Republic of China.
Qiting WenDepartment of Anesthesiology, Dongguan Tungwah Hospital, Dongguan, People's Republic of China.
Zhijian ZhangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Dongguan Tungwah Hospital, Dongguan, People's Republic of China.
Guizhen XuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Dongguan Tungwah Hospital, Dongguan, People's Republic of China.
Binbin XuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Dongguan Tungwah Hospital, Dongguan, People's Republic of China.
Jian ChenDepartment of Anesthesiology, Dongguan Tungwah Hospital, Dongguan, People's Republic of China.
Xueping LiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Dongguan Tungwah Hospital, Dongguan, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This investigation aimed to establish the optimal dosing parameters of oliceridine for postoperative pain control in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) procedures. Using Dixon and Massey's up-and-down sequential allocation method, the median effective dose (ED50) and the dose required for 95% effective dose (ED95) were determined, alongside an evaluation of the agent's safety profile. Methods: In this prospective trial, 82 participants scheduled for LC were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive either oliceridine or saline (control). Prior to surgical incision, the intervention group received varying doses of intravenous oliceridine, while control subjects received equivalent volumes of saline solution. Post-surgical pain management involved standardized multimodal analgesic protocols for both cohorts. Baseline demographic data was documented for all participants. Pain evaluations using the 11-point verbal numeric rating scale (NRS) at 15 min, 30 min, and 2h post-extubation. Using Dixon's up-and-down methodology, the ED50 and ED95 were determined. Hemodynamic variables were tracked and pain levels quantified throughout the procedure. The study protocol included monitoring post-anesthetic recovery characteristics and documenting adverse effects. Results: Probability unit regression analysis indicated that the ED50 of oliceridine for the prevention of early postoperative pain was calculated to be 18.45 µg/kg (95% CI: 16.85-19.82 µg/kg), while the ED95 was determined to be 22.39 µg/kg (95% CI: 20.75-26.98 µg/kg). Statistical analysis showed comparable rates of adverse events between study groups (p > 0.05). Additional analyses demonstrated similar outcomes between oliceridine and control cohorts regarding hemodynamic stability, and adverse effect profiles. Pain management satisfaction assessment at 24 hours post-LC revealed high approval rates in the oliceridine group, with 90% of patients (36/40, p=0.31) and 97.5% of surgeons (39/40, p=0.03) expressing satisfaction, regardless of administered dose. Conclusion: Our findings establish that for early postoperative pain management, oliceridine demonstrates optimal therapeutic efficacy at an ED50 of 18.45 ug/kg, with the ED95 determined to be 22.39 ug/kg.

Indexed as

AnalgesicsCholecystectomy, LaparoscopicPostoperative PainQuinuclidinesAdultAgedDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementProspective StudiesSpiro CompoundsThiophenes((3-methoxythiophen-2-yl)methyl)((2-(9-(pyridin-2-yl)-6-oxaspiro(4.5)decan-9-yl)ethyl))amineAnalgesicsQuinuclidinesSpiro CompoundsThiophenesED50ED95laparoscopic cholecystectomyoliceridinepostoperative pain

Identifiers

PMID40226130
PMCPMC11992992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.