Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40226124›Full record

ArticleJID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health2025

Machine Learning for Early Detection of Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Feasibility Study Using Medical Insurance Claims Data.

Waqar Ali, Jonathan Williams, Betty Xiong, James Zou, Roxana Daneshjou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Waqar AliUCB Pharma, Slough, United Kingdom.
Jonathan WilliamsUCB Pharma, Brussels, Belgium.
Betty XiongDepartment of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
James ZouDepartment of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Roxana DaneshjouDepartment of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) are often misdiagnosed and may wait up to 10 years to receive a diagnosis of HS. This study aimed to predict HS diagnosis prior to actual diagnosis on the basis of previous medical history using models developed with insurance claims data. Three machine learning models were compared with a model using features selected by a dermatologist (clinical baseline model). The study analyzed 5,900,000 United States individuals' insurance records over 13.5 years. The population included 13,886 patients with HS with at least 1 claim in each of the 2 years prior to their first HS diagnosis and 69,428 control patients with no HS diagnosis. The models aimed to classify HS diagnosis status on the basis of clinical features observed over 2 years. Model performance was assessed by area under the receiver operating characterisitic curve, F1-score, and precision and recall rates. The machine learning models (logistic regression, random forest, and XGBoost) showed a higher area under the receiver operating characterisitic curve than the clinical baseline model (logistic regression = 0.75, random forest = 0.79, XGBoost = 0.80, clinical = 0.71). In the clinical model and the best-performing XGBoost model, the top features associated with diagnosis were patient age at prediction and sex. The XGBoost model top features also included the use of sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim and clindamycin phosphate and obesity.

Indexed as

Hidradenitis suppurativaMachine learningMedical claims

Identifiers

PMID40226124
PMCPMC11986968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.