ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2025
Computer-aided drug design for the double-membrane vesicle pore complex inhibitors against SARS-CoV-2.
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Bioactive Furan Derivatives fromCurrent drug discovery technologies · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the etiological agent of the ongoing global pandemic, has constituted the worst global health disaster in recent years. However, no antiviral drugs have proved clinically efficacious to combat SARS-CoV-2 infection. The SARS-CoV-2 double-membrane vesicle (DMV) pore complex, particularly for its positively charged residues R1613, R1614, R303, R305, and R306, which are highly conserved across β-coronaviruses and play a critical role in mediating RNA transport and virus replication, has been validated as an effective drug target. Here, we employed computer-aided drug design (CADD) techniques for the first time to screen the antiviral compounds against SARS-CoV-2 by targeting the crystal structure of the SARS-CoV-2 DMV nsp3-4 pore complex. A total of 486,387 drug compounds were subjected to virtual screening, such as toxicity prediction, ADMET prediction, molecular docking, and target analysis. The six compounds (three for each binding site) were selected based on their lowest binding energies. Notably, Compound 391 demonstrated the strongest binding affinity to the critical positively charged residues R1613 and R1614 at binding site 1, meanwhile, Compound 5,157 exhibited the most stable interactions with the essential positively charged residues R303, R305, and R306 at binding site 2. These results demonstrate that Compound 391 and Compound 5,157 exhibit greater potential antiviral effects, which provide a theoretical basis for further confirmation against SARS-CoV-2
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.