Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40226086›Full record

ArticleTranslational andrology and urology2025

Video discharge instructions increase patient understanding for office-based procedures: a randomized controlled study.

Jenna Bates Maffei, Jeffrey J Song, Gal Saffati, Mohit Khera

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational andrology and urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jenna Bates MaffeiScott Department of Urology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Jeffrey J SongScott Department of Urology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Gal SaffatiScott Department of Urology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-3053-5828
Mohit KheraScott Department of Urology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Health literacy significantly influences healthcare outcomes, with poor literacy leading to worse quality of life, increased mortality, and higher readmission rates. Recent efforts to improve post-encounter education include structured teach-back methods, patient preference assessments, and standardized discharge instructions. Studies in emergency departments have shown that incorporating video discharge instructions enhances patient understanding and retention of care information. To address the gap in urology, this study aims to evaluate patient comprehension and satisfaction with video discharge instructions following clinic-based vasectomy procedures. Methods: We performed an Institutional Review Board approved (#H-51614) unblinded randomized controlled study with written consent from each participant. All men undergoing vasectomy from August to September 2022 in our outpatient clinic were included in our study. Patients were randomized to receive either video or written discharge instructions. A standardized questionnaire was administered containing objective comprehension questions regarding the discharge instructions they received. Patients were also queried on their preference of discharge instruction format and subjective Likert-scale of information usefulness and format understandability. Results: Each cohort contained 11 men. There was no difference in age or educational level between the groups (P=0.91, 0.38, respectively). The video cohort exhibited increased comprehension scores (P<0.001). There was no difference between cohorts in ratings of information helpfulness and instruction understandability (P=0.48, 0.06, respectively). Approximately 73% of men in the video group preferred to receive both video and written instructions while 73% patients in the written cohort preferred to receive only written instructions (P<0.001). Conclusions: Use of video discharge instructions significantly improved objective comprehension with similar perceptions of information helpfulness and understandability. Patients who received video discharge instructions were more likely to prefer receiving both written and video instructions than those who received written instructions. Overall, these findings support the utility of video discharge instructions in a urologic setting.

Indexed as

Patient dischargepatient educationquestionnaireurologyvasectomy

Identifiers

PMID40226086
PMCPMC11986496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.