ArticleTranslational andrology and urology2025
Video platforms and sexual healthcare in China: assessment of content on premature ejaculation.
Article in Translational andrology and urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Premature ejaculation (PE) is among the most commonly reported types of sexual dysfunction both globally and in China. Despite the growing popularity of online healthcare services and the greater availability of information in mainland China, there is a pressing need to assess the quality and reliability of PE-related content available online and address the potential impact of online misinformation. Thus, in this study, we assessed the quality of information regarding PE videos on the top video websites in China. Methods: The top 10 video platforms in mainland China were searched using PE-related keywords for videos published as of July 2023. All available videos were examined for eligibility and reliability, and two reviewers independently evaluated the videos using Global Quality Score (GQS) scores for quality and DISCERN tools for their content reliability. All data were analyzed with SPSS software (IBM Corp.). Results: Information on sexual medicine content related to PE was found to be available on just seven of the websites examined. From the 1,468 videos initially retrieved, 582 met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 319 videos (54.81%) were deemed reliable, while 263 (45.19%) were classified as unreliable. The agreement between the two urologists reviewing the videos and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were deemed acceptable. There were significant differences in the quality, reliability, source, presentation format, and themes of the videos. Conclusions: The quality of resources on Chinese video platforms varies widely. Users seeking PE-related information should carefully select the appropriate platforms and opt for higher-quality videos. The existing participation of professional medical personnel was seen as insufficient, and joint efforts are needed to implement content review and the establishment of an evaluation framework.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.