ArticleTranslational andrology and urology2025
Sarcomatoid carcinoma of the penis: a case report.
Article in Translational andrology and urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Penile cancer is a rare tumour with a global annual incidence of 0.2 to 1 case per 100,000 men. Sarcomatoid carcinoma (SC) of the penis, also known as carcinosarcoma, is a rare form of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the penis, accounting for approximately 1-2% of all penile cancers. We report a case of SC of the penis in a 60-year-old man. Case Description: A 60-year-old male patient presented, with a penile glans nodule that had developed over a two-month period. The patient was employed in the agricultural sector and had a history of hypertension, which he asserted was effectively managed through pharmacological intervention. A specialist examination revealed an enlarged, cauliflower-shaped penile head with surface ulceration, approximately the size of 2 cm. He underwent a partial resection and bilateral inguinal and pelvic lymph node dissection. Histopathology demonstrated that the tumour cells were p63-positive, while p16 expression was absent. Vimentin and p53 were positive in the sarcomatous component, and the morphology and immunohistochemistry were consistent with penile SC. After six months, there was no evidence of disease progression. Conclusions: The diagnosis of SC is challenging, and an accurate diagnosis is the first step towards successful treatment, which has a higher probability of success. It presents as a large, aggressive tumour, usually associated with lymph node metastasis and poor prognosis. Our case adds to the literature and reviews the treatment options for this rare disease and the poor prognosis associated with this malignancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.