ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2025
Analysis of influencing factors and clinical application of a predictive model for emergence agitation from general anesthesia after abdominal surgery.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparative analysis of general anaesthesia with and without dexmedetomidine in emergence agitation.Bioinformation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo identify factors influencing emergence agitation (EA) in abdominal surgery patients and develop a predictive model for early clinical intervention.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed data from 794 patients who underwent abdominal surgery between June 2022 and June 2024. Independent risk factors for EA were identified using multivariate logistic regression, which informed the construction of a nomogram model. The dataset was split into a training set (67%) and a validation set (33%), with an additional 119 patients serving as an external validation set. Data analysis was performed using SPSS 26.0 and R 4.3.3, and model performance was assessed using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) and calibration curves.
resultsMultivariate analysis revealed nine independent risk factors for EA: age, ASA classification, type of surgery, duration of surgery, intraoperative fluid volume, use of analgesic pumps, catheter usage, postoperative pain, and smoking history. The model's area under the curve (AUC) was 0.787 in the training set, 0.623 in the validation set, and 0.666 in the external validation set, indicating good predictive performance. Calibration curves demonstrated a strong agreement between predicted and observed outcomes, confirming the model's accuracy and consistency.
conclusionThe developed nomogram integrates multiple risk factors to predict EA risk in abdominal surgery patients. It demonstrates high stability and applicability across different datasets, facilitating early identification of high-risk patients and supporting individualized postoperative management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.