Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40226033›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2025

Clinical observation of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy for lumbar disc herniation and analysis of influencing factors for recurrence.

Jie Li, Xu Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of translational research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. [Comparison of effectiveness between visualized reamer foraminoplasty and transforaminal endoscopic spine system technique in transforminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy for lumbar disc herniation].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jie LiDepartment of Spine, The Second Hospital of Tangshan No. 21 Jianshe North Road, Tangshan 063000, Hebei, China.
Xu WangDepartment of Spine, The Second Hospital of Tangshan No. 21 Jianshe North Road, Tangshan 063000, Hebei, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate the clinical effects of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PELD) in treating lumbar disc herniation (LDH) and analyze the related factors for postoperative recurrence.

methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 168 patients with lumbar disc herniation who underwent percutaneous transforaminal endoscopy at the Second Hospital of Tangshan from January 2017 to January 2021. The patients were followed up for 1 year. The Oswestry disability index (ODI) and visual analog scale (VAS) for low back pain/radicular pain were recorded before the operation and at the final follow-up. The patients' overall responses were evaluated according to Stauffer-Coventry's response evaluation criteria. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression were used to analyze the relationship between basic data indicators and postoperative recurrence.

resultsCompared with preoperative values, the postoperative VAS scores and ODI indices were significantly reduced at different time points (both P < 0.05). During the final follow-up, the efficacy was rated as excellent in 55 cases, good in 59 cases, fair in 35 cases, and poor in 19 cases, with an overall excellent and good rate of 67.86%. Among them, 12 patients had postoperative recurrence, with a recurrence rate of 7.14%. Univariate analysis indicated that age ≥ 49 years, BMI ≥ 24.62 kg/m

conclusionPELD surgery for LDH can achieve favorable clinical efficacy. However, intraoperative annulus fibrosus injury and incomplete removal of the nucleus pulposus during surgery may lead to secondary recurrence in patients.

Indexed as

efficacyLumbar disc herniationpercutaneous transforaminal endoscopyrecurrencerisk factors

Identifiers

PMID40226033
PMCPMC11982894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.