ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2025
Construction of a stroke green channel process based on the PDCA cycle management model and its impact on stroke prognosis.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The green channel surgical mode for traumatic brain injury can reduce the mortality rate of patients with severe traumatic brain injury- a single center analysis from China.Neurosurgical review · 2026Article
- Effect of PDCA-optimized good limb positioning on hemiparetic rehabilitation outcomes in acute cerebral infarction.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the impact of implementing a stroke green channel process (GCP) based on the PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act) cycle on stroke prognosis.
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University by reviewing data of 259 stroke patients from January 2021 to December 2023. Patients were divided into two cohorts: 114 patients managed by the PDCA-based GCP and 145 patients receiving standard care (non-green channel process, NGCP). Key metrics assessed included demographic data, rescue indicators, and prognostic outcomes - neurological function, life ability, and quality of life.
resultsThe GCP group demonstrated significantly reduced triage (P = 0.009) and computed tomography (CT) scan completion times (P = 0.042), leading to shorter hospital stay durations (P = 0.022) and fewer transfer incidents (P = 0.001). Neurological and cognitive functions improved in the GCP group, evidenced by lower National Institute of Health stroke scale (NIHSS) scores (P = 0.011) and higher Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) (P = 0.008) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores (P = 0.032). Functional abilities and independence also improved, with higher Activities of Daily Living (ADL) (P = 0.007) and Barthel scores (P = 0.003), alongside lower Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores (P < 0.001). Adverse reactions were less frequent in the GCP group (total incidence rate P < 0.001).
conclusionImplementing a stroke GCP managed with the PDCA cycle significantly improves stroke prognosis, enhancing clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.