Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40225978›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2025

Effect of nursing intervention on quality of life of patients with gastric ulcer based on KANO model.

Shuhua Chen, Qun Hu, Wenying Liang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of translational research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shuhua ChenDepartment of Gastroenterology, Yichun People's Hospital Yichun 336000, Jiangxi, China.
Qun HuDepartment of Pain, Yichun People's Hospital Yichun 336000, Jiangxi, China.
Wenying LiangDepartment of Nursing, Yichun People's Hospital Yichun 336000, Jiangxi, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore the quality attributes of nursing interventions for improving the quality of life of patients with gastric ulcers using the KANO model, and to design and implement targeted nursing measures and evaluate their effects.

methodsClinical data from 136 inpatients with gastric ulcers hospitalized between January 2022 and January 2024 were analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups based on the nursing approach: the experimental group (n=68), which received nursing care based on the KANO model, and the control group (n=68), which received routine care. The two groups were compared in terms of general clinical data, symptom improvement, health-promoting lifestyle scores, nursing satisfaction, emotional state, and quality of life assessed using the SF-36 questionnaire.

resultsPost-intervention, the experimental group demonstrated significantly lower Hamilton Anxiety and Depression Scale scores compared to the control group (both P<0.05). Scores for physical, psychological, social, and material functions in the SF-36 were also significantly higher in the experimental group (all P<0.05). Additionally, scores for health responsibility, nutrition, stress management, exercise, interpersonal support, self-actualization, and overall health-promoting lifestyle were significantly higher in the experimental group (all P<0.05). The incidence of acid reflux, abdominal pain, and burning sensation was lower in the experimental group than that in the control group after the intervention (P<0.05).

conclusionsNursing interventions based on the KANO model effectively improve clinical symptoms, quality of life, and emotional well-being in patients with gastric ulcers. They also enhance nursing satisfaction, providing a superior approach to routine care.

Indexed as

gastric ulcerKano model of customer satisfactionNursing interventionquality of life

Identifiers

PMID40225978
PMCPMC11982846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.