ArticleHuman mutation2024
CAVaLRi: An Algorithm for Rapid Identification of Diagnostic Germline Variation.
Article in Human mutation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tracing the evolution of sequencing into the era of genomic medicine.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2025Review
- geneEX: An Integrated Phenotype-Driven Algorithm for Rapid Identification of Causative Variants in Monogenic Disorders.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2025Article
- Making sense of missense: challenges and opportunities in variant pathogenicity prediction.Disease models & mechanisms · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clinical exome and genome sequencing (ES/GS) have become indispensable diagnostic tools for rare genetic diseases (RGD). However, the interpretation of ES/GS presents a substantial operational challenge in clinical settings. Test interpretation requires the review of hundreds of genetic variants, a task that has become increasingly challenging given the rising use of ES/GS. In response, we present Clinical Assessment of Variants by Likelihood Ratios (CAVaLRi), which employ a modified likelihood ratio (LR) framework to assign diagnostic probabilities to candidate germline disease genes. CAVaLRi models aspects of the clinical variant assessment process, taking into consideration the predicted impact of the variant, the proband and parental genotypes, and the proband's clinical characteristics. It also factors in computational phenotype noise and weighs the relative significance of genotype, phenotype, and variant segregation information. We trained and tested CAVaLRi on variant and phenotype data from an internal cohort of 655 clinical ES cases. For validation, CAVaLRi's performance was benchmarked against four leading gene prioritization algorithms (Exomiser's hiPHIVE and PhenIX prioritizers, LIRICAL, and XRare) using a distinct cohort of 12,832 ES cases. Our findings reveal that CAVaLRi significantly outperforms its counterparts when clinician-curated phenotype sets are used, as evidenced by its superior precision-recall curve (PR AUC: 0.701) and average diagnostic gene rank (1.59). Notably, even when substituting highly focused clinician-curated phenotype sets with large and potentially nonspecific computationally derived phenotypes, CAVaLRi retains its precision (PR AUC: 0.658; diagnostic gene average rank: 1.68) and markedly outperforms other tools. In a large, heterogeneous validation cohort, CAVaLRi stood out as the most precise prioritization algorithm (PR AUC: 0.335; average diagnostic rank: 1.91). In conclusion, CAVaLRi presents a robust solution for prioritizing diagnostic genes, surpassing current methods. It demonstrates resilience to noisy, computationally-derived phenotypes, providing a scalable strategy to help labs focus on the most diagnostically relevant variants, thus addressing the growing demand for ES/GS interpretation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.