ArticleHuman mutation2024
Characterisation of a LINE-1 Insertion in the
Article in Human mutation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Long-read Sequencing in Inherited Retinal Dystrophies: A Systematic Review.Ophthalmology science · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Retinitis pigmentosa (RP) is a group of inherited degenerative retinal disorders affecting more than 1.5 million people worldwide. For 30-50% of individuals with RP, the genetic cause remains unresolved by current clinical diagnostic gene panels. It is likely explained by variants in novel RP-associated genes or noncoding regulatory regions, or by complex genetic alterations such as large structural variants. Recent developments in long-read sequencing techniques have opened an opportunity for efficient analysis of complex genetic variants. We analysed a Finnish family with dominantly inherited RP affecting six individuals in three generations. Two affected individuals underwent a comprehensive clinical examination in combination with a clinical diagnostic gene panel, followed by whole exome sequencing in our laboratory. They exhibited typical signs of RP, yet initial sequence analysis found no causative variants. Reanalysis of the sequencing data detected a LINE-1 (L1) retrotransposon insertion of unknown size in exon 4 of the RP1 axonemal microtubule-associated (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.