ArticleEcology and evolution2025
Sexual Dimorphism in Fin Size and Shape in North American Killifish.
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Experimentally testing the function of anal fins in the bluefin killifish, Lucania goodei.Journal of fish biology · 2026Article
- Sexual Dimorphism in Fin Size and Shape in Bluefin Killifish.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sexual dimorphism is intriguing because it suggests that males and females differ in phenotypic optima for traits and that sex-specific trait values can evolve despite a shared genome. Differences in sexual dimorphism across populations or species suggest that the nature of sexual selection and/or genetic constraints differ among species. Here, we measured sexual dimorphism in 20 species of North American killifish (Fundulidae) in size and shape of dorsal, anal, and caudal fins. We observed profound sexual dimorphism in anal and dorsal fin size and shape across all species, suggesting a common direction of selection. Sexual dimorphism was also present in caudal fin size and shape but was much lower in magnitude, with several species not differing from a null expectation of zero. There was little evidence for a phylogenetic signal in the levels of sexual dimorphism in dorsal and anal fin traits. We also found a strong phylogenetic correlation between sexual dimorphism in anal and dorsal fin shape but no phylogenetic correlation between fin area, base length, or ray length across different fins. Our results indicate that there is pronounced sexual dimorphism in anal and dorsal fin size and shape across fundulids. Similar patterns of sexual dimorphism in anal and dorsal fin properties have been documented in other groups, including gars, bichirs, graylings, minnows, and many species in the Atherinomorpha, suggesting that this pattern may be common across Actinopterygii.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.