ArticleInternational journal of medical sciences2025
Hematological parameters and major adverse cardiovascular events: a prospective study in a Chinese population involving 2,970 participants.
Article in International journal of medical sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison the clinical outcomes of intravenous and subcutaneous erythropoietin administration in hemodialysis patients of plateau regions.BMC nephrology · 2026Article
- Early postoperative red cell distribution width is associated with prolonged hospital stay and complications after non-cardiac surgery in neonates.International journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
- Cardiac and systemic biological age capture complementary aging signals associated with cardiovascular disease.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Physiological-immune resilience risk assessment model for predicting adverse cardiac outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hematological parameters are among the most accessible and routinely performed clinical tests. Recent studies have gradually revealed their potential for risk prediction. This study aimed to assess the association between hematological parameters and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) in patients with coronary artery disease. This prospective study included 2,970 Chinese participants who underwent coronary angiography, with hematological and biochemical indicators measured at baseline. MACEs, comprising myocardial infarction, stroke, revascularization, and all-cause mortality, were recorded during follow-up. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to evaluate the relationship between the hematological parameters and MACEs. Over a median follow-up period of 79 months, 474 MACEs were documented. Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated that the participants with lower levels of RBC, PLT, PCT, LYMPH% and BASO%, as well as higher RDW-CV, RDW-SD, MONO% and NEUT%, exhibited reduced survival probability. Multivariate Cox regression analysis identified elevated RDW-CV as a significant risk factor for MACE (T3 HR, 1.292; 95% CI, 1.013-1.647;
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.