ArticleActa stomatologica Croatica2025
Articular Eminence Inclination between Croatian and American Skulls.
Article in Acta stomatologica Croatica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To determine and compare articular eminence inclination (AEI) values between Croatian and American skulls. Materials and Methods: The study was carried out on 210 human dry skulls divided into Croatian (early medieval, late medieval and contemporary), and American (Illinois, Kentucky, contemporary African Americans and American Caucasians) groups. AEI was measured by two methods (M1 and M2) on 5 sagittal sections through virtual silicone impressions of articular eminence. The obtained results were analyzed at the significance level of p<0.05. Results: No statistically significant differences of AEI values were obtained with regard to the group of skulls, body side, sex and age (p>0.05). AEI M2 values were statistically significantly higher than AEI M1 values (p<0.05). Conclusions: Comparing the AEI values between different group of skulls can reveal insights into TMJ morphology, and can also shed light on possible evolutionary adaptations, dietary influences, and genetic diversity across cultures. According to the results of this study, AEI values were not affected by group of skulls, body side, sex and age or at least not as much as needed for significant changes. However, a measurement method significantly influences AEI values, with higher AEI M2 values compared to AEI M1 values.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.