ArticleActa stomatologica Croatica2025
Novel Transoral Endoscopic Assisted Minimally Invasive Method for Mandibular Condyle Fractures in Croatia: A Case Presentation and Literature Review.
Article in Acta stomatologica Croatica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Endoscope-Assisted or Skin-Approach Osteosynthesis of Mandibular Condylar Fracture-A Comparison.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Mandibular fractures, particularly condylar process fractures, are common in maxillofacial surgery and require effective treatment methods that minimize complications while ensuring functional and esthetic recovery. Objectives: This paper presents two cases of mandibular condylar process fractures treated using a transoral endoscopically assisted technique (EATA), thus marking the first documented application of this approach in Croatia. The aim was to evaluate the efficacy of this minimally invasive method compared to traditional extraoral approaches, which often carry risks such as visible scarring, facial nerve injury, and prolonged postoperative recovery. Methods: A 30° rigid endoscope and specialized angled instruments were utilized in both cases to achieve precise visualization, reduction, and fixation of the fractures. The first case involved a young male with a double mandibular fracture, while the second case addressed an isolated condylar fracture in an older female with comorbidities. Results: Both patients were successfully treated without complications, including facial nerve injury, hematomas, or salivary fistulas. Hospitalization periods were shorter compared to traditional approaches, and recovery included restored temporomandibular joint function (TMJ), stable occlusion, and the absence of visible scars. The EATA method proved to be safe and effective, offering numerous advantages such as reduced morbidity, minimal soft tissue trauma, and superior aesthetic outcomes. Despite requiring specialized equipment and additional surgical training, EATA has significant potential to become a standard treatment modality for mandibular fractures. Conclusion: The findings of this study contribute to the growing body of evidence supporting the clinical benefits of this minimally invasive technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.