Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40225818›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2024

Evaluating the implementation of adult smoking cessation programs in community settings: a scoping review.

Remai Mitchell, Kerry-Ann F O'Grady, David Brain, Megumi Lim, Natalia Gonzalez Bohorquez, Ureni Halahakone, Simone Braithwaite, Joanne Isbel, Shelley Peardon-Freeman, Madonna Kennedy and 1 more

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Remai MitchellAustralian Centre for Health Services Innovation (AusHSI), School of Public Health and Social Work Centre for Healthcare Transformation, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Kerry-Ann F O'GradyAustralian Centre for Health Services Innovation (AusHSI), School of Public Health and Social Work Centre for Healthcare Transformation, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
David BrainAustralian Centre for Health Services Innovation (AusHSI), School of Public Health and Social Work Centre for Healthcare Transformation, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Megumi LimAustralian Centre for Health Services Innovation (AusHSI), School of Public Health and Social Work Centre for Healthcare Transformation, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Natalia Gonzalez BohorquezAustralian Centre for Health Services Innovation (AusHSI), School of Public Health and Social Work Centre for Healthcare Transformation, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Ureni HalahakoneAustralian Centre for Health Services Innovation (AusHSI), School of Public Health and Social Work Centre for Healthcare Transformation, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Simone BraithwaiteQueensland Public Health and Scientific Services Division, Queensland Department of Health, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Joanne IsbelHealth Contact Centre, Queensland Ambulance Service, Queensland Department of Health, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Shelley Peardon-FreemanHealth Contact Centre, Queensland Ambulance Service, Queensland Department of Health, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Madonna KennedyQueensland Public Health and Scientific Services Division, Queensland Department of Health, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Zephanie TyackAustralian Centre for Health Services Innovation (AusHSI), School of Public Health and Social Work Centre for Healthcare Transformation, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, QLD, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Tobacco smoking is a leading contributor to preventable morbidity and premature mortality globally. Although evidence-based smoking cessation programs have been implemented, there is limited evidence on the application of theories, models, and frameworks (TMFs), and implementation strategies to support such programs. This scoping review mapped the evidence for interventions, TMFs, and implementation strategies used for smoking cessation programs in the community. Methods: We searched four electronic databases in addition to grey literature and conducted hand-searching between February and December 2023. Original studies of qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods were considered for inclusion. Studies reporting prospectively planned and/or delivered implementation of smoking cessation interventions or programs, incorporating contextual factors, use of implementation TMF, implementation strategies, or other factors influencing implementation were considered for inclusion. Intervention components were categorized using the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist. Implementation strategies were mapped to the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) Strategy Clusters. Results: A total of 31 studies were included. We identified 12 discrete interventions, commonly included as part of multicomponent interventions. Most studies reported tailoring or modifying interventions at the population or individual level. We identified 19 distinct implementation TMFs used to prospectively guide or evaluate implementation in 26 out of 31 included studies. Studies reported diverse implementation strategies. Three studies embedded culturally appropriate TMFs or local cultural guidance into the implementation process. These studies took a collaborative approach with the communities through partnership, participation, cultural tailoring, and community-directed implementation. Discussion: Our findings highlight the methods by which the implementation of smoking cessation may be supported within the community. Whilst there is debate surrounding their necessity, there are practical benefits to applying TMFs for implementing, evaluating, and disseminating findings. We determined that whilst ERIC was well-suited as a framework for guiding the implementation of future smoking cessation programs, there was inconsistent use of implementation strategies across the ERIC domains. Our findings highlight a lack of harmonization in the literature to culturally tailor implementation processes for local communities.

Indexed as

Program EvaluationSmoking CessationAdultHumansand frameworksco-designimplementation scienceimplementation strategiesmodelsscoping reviewsmoking cessation interventionstheories

Identifiers

PMID40225818
PMCPMC11988889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.