Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40225814›Full record

ArticleRationality and society2025

Explaining mobilization for revolts by private interests and kinship relations. A response to the comment by Nieva.

Niccolò Giorgio Armandola, Malte Doehne, Katja Rost

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Rationality and society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Niccolò Giorgio ArmandolaUniversity of Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0438-3964
Malte DoehneUniversity of Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2579-8421
Katja RostUniversity of Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7752-7818

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We appreciate Ricardo Nieva's thoughtful engagement with our paper and his proposal to interpret our case study through the lens of his theoretical framework. Indeed, we noted the potential of such a connection in the original paper, and thank Professor Nieva for taking up our suggestion. This response aims to identify points of overlap between our accounts, clarify key conceptual distinctions, and explore the implications of each approach for understanding the dynamics of mobilization.

Indexed as

civil uprisingskinship relationsPrivate interestsrevoltssocial networks

Identifiers

PMID40225814
PMCPMC11991050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.