Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40225803›Full record

ArticleAsian bioethics review2025

The Ethics of Fetal Cardiac Intervention.

Jonathan Tze Liang Choo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asian bioethics review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jonathan Tze Liang ChooCardiology Service, Department of Paediatric Subspecialties, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in fetal cardiac ultrasound technologies and refinements in cardiac catheterization techniques have made fetal cardiac intervention a reasonable option for fetuses with cardiac abnormalities such as fetal aortic stenosis and fetal hypoplastic left heart syndrome. These procedures - fetal aortic balloon valvuloplasty and fetal atrial stenting - are performed on the physical body of the mother for the benefit of the fetus, and yet carry risks to both mother and fetus. This paper reviews the ethics of fetal cardiac intervention in fetal left heart disease. It provides the ethical underpinnings for the development and performance of these procedures and outlines a practical ethical framework for counselling families in the face or these cardiac abnormalities. There is a need for careful case selection and a need to review these cases after fetal cardiac intervention. The establishment of registries to collect pre-procedural data and to monitor short and long-term procedural outcomes is expected to strengthen the evidence for ethical decision-making.

Indexed as

Aortic stenosisFetal cardiologyFetal catheter intervention

Identifiers

PMID40225803
PMCPMC11982001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.