Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40225801›Full record

ArticleAsian bioethics review2025

The Complexity of an Agreement: A Cross-Cultural Perspective on 'Yes, Doctor' Communication with Patients.

Mora Claramita, Indah Kartika Murni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asian bioethics review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mora ClaramitaDepartment of Medical Education and Bioethics, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Indah Kartika MurniDepartment of Child Health, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada/Dr. Sardjito Hospital, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article explores the communication challenges faced by health professionals working with patients from high-context cultures (i.e. those that emphasize non-verbal communication), particularly in Southeast Asia, and proposes strategies to enhance interaction and patient care. Attention should be put on the impact of cultural dimensions such as high power distance and collectivism on patient behaviour and decision-making. In high power distance cultures, patients may be passive and reluctant to voice concerns, while collectivistic values often influence decisions through family or community input. To address these challenges, communication guides designed to improve interactions include observing subtle non-verbal and para-verbal cues, practicing active listening, encouraging patient participation, providing adequate consultation time, and discussing care plans collaboratively. Additionally, using familial terms of address and incorporating Kleinmann's eight questions are recommended to bridge cultural gaps and facilitate a better understanding of patients' perspectives. The proposed strategies aim to foster a culturally sensitive and patient-centred approach, enhancing communication, improving patient satisfaction, and leading to better health outcomes. By implementing these practices, health professionals can navigate cultural complexities more effectively and deliver high-quality, respectful care.

Indexed as

Communication skillsCross-cultural communicationInformed and shared decision-makingPatient-centred communication

Identifiers

PMID40225801
PMCPMC11981964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.