ArticleAJPM focus2025
Patterns of Factors in the National Institute on Aging Health Disparities Research Framework Domains and Mild Cognitive Impairment Risk.
Article in AJPM focus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association Between Structural and Social Determinants of Health and Cognitive Functioning Among African Americans: the ARCHES Cohort.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2025Article
- Muscle strength, EEG biomarkers, and working memory as interacting predictors of cognitive function in cognitively impaired older adults.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2025Article
- Exercise-Based Pain Interventions for People with Dementia Using a Biopsychosocial-Environmental (BPSE) Model.Current geriatrics reports · 2025Review
- Reliability of remote self-administered Web-based digital cognitive measures and comparison to in-person neuropsychological tests: Stricker Learning Span, Symbols Test, and the Mayo Test Drive Screening Battery Composite.Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Alzheimer's disease and related dementias are public health and social care challenges. This study used the National Institute on Aging Health Disparities Research Framework to organize potential cognitive impairment risk factors. It aimed to examine patterns of environmental, sociocultural, behavioral, and biological factors and identify key components that predict mild cognitive impairment risk. Methods: This study comprised 2,812 participants from the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging who were cognitively unimpaired at baseline (aged ≥50 years, mean age [SD]=68.9 [9.7] years, 50.4% female). Analyses utilized a 2-stage approach using factor and principal component analyses to group factors from multiple National Institute on Aging Health Disparities Research Framework domains and identify components that predict cognitive impairment risk. Using a cohort study design, the resulting composite scores were considered as covariates for incident mild cognitive impairment analysis using Cox proportional hazards models. Results: Three principal components explained 40.30% of the variance and were differentially associated with mild cognitive impairment risk. One component (Principal Component 2), which included factors from all 4 domains of the National Institute on Aging Health Disparities Research Framework (including social, group, and playing game activities [sociocultural domain]; exercise and physical activity [behavioral domain]; education/occupation [environmental domain]; and absence of cardiometabolic risk factors/health self-rating [biological domain]), was associated with lower mild cognitive impairment risk (hazard ratio=0.80, 95% CI=0.73, 0.89). The other 2 principal components, also including factors from multiple framework domains, were associated with increased mild cognitive impairment risk. Conclusions: Derived principal components included factors from multiple framework domains, supporting the multietiology pathways leading to cognitive impairment. These principal components were differentially associated with mild cognitive impairment risk. Identifying key factors from multiple National Institute on Aging Health Disparities Research Framework domains associated with cognitive impairment risk has implications for effectively targeting interventions at multiple levels (e.g., medical, societal, policy) to avert or delay cognitive impairment risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.