Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40225605›Full record

ArticleJournal of nursing management2023

Toxic Absence: Why Leader Presence Matters in Times of Crisis.

Robert McMurray, Nicki Credland, Martyn Griffin, Peter Hamilton, Oonagh Harness

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nursing management, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Robert McMurrayUniversity of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1162-4471
Nicki CredlandUniversity of Hull, Hull, UK.
Martyn GriffinUniversity of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Peter HamiltonDurham University, Durham, UK.
Oonagh HarnessNorthumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: This study examines the importance of senior-leader presence on the "frontline" in times of crisis. Background: The COVID-19 pandemic placed unprecedented demands on nurses charged with delivering critical care. Extant research suggests that the active presence of ward-level leaders has an important role to play in supporting frontline staff and mediating the negative impacts of stress and burnout. There is little evidence on the impact of senior leader presence or absence on the experience of frontline critical care nurses, particularly at times of crisis. Methods: A three-phase qualitative interview study of critical care nurses in the UK and Ireland. A total of 107 semistructured interviews with 54 nurses representing 38 different healthcare units. Results: Senior-leader presence at the time of crisis serves as an important symbol of organisational support. Where senior leaders are not meaningfully present, they risk allowing the necessary pain of difficult work situations to become toxic. Toxicity is manifested with increased staff stress, emotional ills, absence, and turnover. Conclusions: Senior leaders must balance their responsibilities for strategy and structures with the frontline presence required to shape a positive emotional climate.

Indexed as

COVID-19LeadershipNurse AdministratorsNursing Staff, HospitalAdultBurnout, ProfessionalFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicIrelandMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsQualitative ResearchSARS-CoV-2United Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID40225605
PMCPMC11918943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.