Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40225595›Full record

ArticleJournal of nursing management2023

Perspectives on Nurse Retention in Hospitals in the Netherlands: A Qualitative Study.

Annamarike Seller-Boersma, Cecile Boot, Catharina van Oostveen, Irene Jongerden, Michele van Vugt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nursing management, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Key factors associated with nurse retention and how they work: A mixed-methods study.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2026
    Article
  2. Nurse staffing models that rely on employment of temporary nurses: A realist review.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Annamarike Seller-BoersmaAmsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Department of Human Resources, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0002-4102-7747
Cecile BootAmsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Societal Participation and Health, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5021-9957
Catharina van OostveenSpaarne Gasthuis Academy, Spaarne Gasthuis Hospital, Hoofddorp, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3483-2206
Irene JongerdenAmsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Quality of Care, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6637-7631
Michele van VugtAmsterdam University Medical Centers, Department of Internal Medicine and Infectious Diseases, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8365-2482

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: To explore hospital nurses' perceptions of working conditions that affect their retention and to identify preconditions for retention across nursing subgroups and informants directly involved in the work that nurses do. Introduction: Understanding why nurses want to stay in their job is essential for hospitals to improve retention and develop policies to combat nursing shortages. Retention barriers are known, but mostly pre-COVID-19 and in specific nursing subgroups, while nursing teams are diverse in life phase, education, and expertise. Materials and Methods: A qualitative study with semistructured focus group interviews with nurses from different hospitals. We held interviews with nursing students and with newly graduated, experienced, specialized, and master-educated nurses. In addition, we held interviews with informants directly involved in the work that nurses do. Results: Three themes concerning the perceptions of working conditions and retention preconditions were identified among subgroups: (1) nurses finding their personal pathway, indicating work that fits individual challenges during the life course and work that matches personal motives and authority and control over professional practice; (2) constructive collaboration within the nursing team and with their manager and physicians; and (3) availability of supportive facilities, e.g., development, professionalization, working environment, and rewards. Conclusion: Elements for retention occur at individual, team, and organizational levels. Nurses find it important that their profession aligns with their personal pathway and are motivated by constructive collaboration in a stimulating team. They emphasized organizational support in realizing career tracks and in active participation in decision-making. These themes are consistent across subgroups and encompass multiple interacting elements.

Indexed as

NursesNursing Staff, HospitalPerceptionPersonnel TurnoverAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelCOVID-19FemaleFocus GroupsHumansInterviews as TopicJob SatisfactionMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID40225595
PMCPMC11919203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.