Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40225556›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

The Incidence of Osteoporosis in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Under 65: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Katherine Quesada Tibbetts, Rahul Mhaskar, Neelesh Prakash

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Katherine Quesada TibbettsRadiology, University of South Florida Health Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, USA.
Rahul MhaskarInternal Medicine, University of South Florida Health Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, USA.
Neelesh PrakashRadiology, University of South Florida Health Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients have a heightened prevalence of low bone mineral density (BMD) and the development of osteoporosis. Osteoporosis screening guidelines only recommend dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scans for females 65 and older and males 70 and older. We set out to analyze the incidence of low BMD in HCC patients under 65 years old and encourage implementation of DEXA screenings for this patient population.

methodIn this retrospective cohort study, 170 patients under 65 with an HCC diagnosis were analyzed. Hounsfield units (HU) from L1 non-contrast CT scans are a reliable predictor of T-scores from DEXA scans and were used to predict BMD in patients, with scores of less than 165 HU indicative of osteopenia and less than 98 indicative of osteoporosis.

resultsThe median HU score of patients was 137.2, and the mean score was 142.6 (minimum: 55.4; maximum: 303.1). Of the total 170 patients, 128 (75%) had an HU score of less than 165, indicating a high likelihood of suffering from low BMD. Among low BMD patients, 25 (20%) were identified as within a range of osteoporosis.

conclusionsHCC patients under 65 have an increased incidence of bone demineralization. We suggest that BMD in HCC patients is an important prognostic tool and parameter to document, as studies have shown that HCC patients with high BMD have longer overall survival than patients with low BMD. Future prospective studies using DEXA scans to assess BMD should be completed to verify the risk of osteoporosis.

Indexed as

bone demineralizationcancerctdexaendocrinologyhepatocellular carcinomaimaging guidelinesliver diseaseosteoporosispreventative medicine

Identifiers

PMID40225556
PMCPMC11991928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.