ArticleCureus2025
Thirty-Nine Years Later: A Case Report and Literature Review of Delayed Pleural and Pericardial Effusions After Chest Radiotherapy for Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Radiation therapy (RT) is a common treatment for non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) but can lead to long-term pulmonary and cardiovascular complications. Delayed radiotherapy-related pleural effusion (DRPE) and pericardial effusion are rare sequelae, with few cases reported. This case highlights recurrent pleural and pericardial effusions nearly 40 years after chest RT, underscoring the need for ongoing surveillance in cancer survivors. A 51-year-old female with a history of nodular sclerosing NHL in remission after RT in 1977 presented in 2016 with recurrent bilateral pleural and pericardial effusions. Despite multiple interventions, including pericardiocentesis, thoracenteses, and pleural catheter placement, her effusions persisted. An extensive workup ruled out malignancy, infection, and autoimmune causes, ultimately attributing the effusions to radiation-induced lung injury. Despite ongoing management, she was discharged to hospice care. DRPE is a diagnostic challenge due to its delayed onset, sometimes appearing decades after RT. It can present with variable pleural fluid characteristics. Radiation-induced lung injury is a known complication of thoracic RT, with risk factors including radiation dose and pre-existing pulmonary conditions. Management is symptomatic, with treatments such as NSAIDs, corticosteroids, diuretics, and pleural drainage, though outcomes vary. In this case, pleural catheter placement offered temporary relief, but recurrent effusions led to hospice care. This case highlights the need for long-term monitoring in survivors of chest RT, as delayed pulmonary and cardiovascular toxicities can arise decades later. Given the rarity of DRPE and the lack of standardized treatment, further research into protective strategies and early interventions for radiation-induced lung injury is essential to improve cancer survivors' quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.