ArticleCureus2025
Artificial Intelligence System for Automatic Mammary Region Extraction Using Semi-subjective Corrected Region for Breast Composition Evaluation.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Recently, breast composition has been used as a clinical indicator for breast cancer. Although systems have been developed for objectively extracting mammary gland regions, relying on subjective judgment to identify correct mammary gland regions for breast composition can lead to significant inter-judgment variation. In this study, we automatically extracted mammary gland regions using semi-subjective corrected regions that extract only mammary gland regions while simultaneously determining quantitative regions and examining whether extracted results could be used clinically. Methods We used 670 mammograms (Pe-ru-ru, Canon Medical Systems Corporation, Tochigi, Japan). A breast physician with 30 years of experience reading mammograms subjectively evaluated mammary gland regions based on the quantitatively determined regions. We defined these images as semi-subjective corrected region images. Further, we used U-Net for segmentation and the dice coefficient as the evaluation index for the region extraction accuracy. The parameters of U-Net (number of downsampling layers, learning rate, and batch size) and the orientation of input images were changed to improve accuracy. In addition, we calculated the dice coefficient based on the breast composition type to evaluate the clinical usefulness of this study. Results The average dice coefficient with the highest accuracy was 0.882; the average dice coefficients were 0.992, 0.832, 0.904, and 0.943 for fatty, scattered, heterogeneous dense, and extremely dense regions, respectively. Conclusion The mammary gland region was automatically extracted using semi-subjective corrected region images. The average dice coefficients for the whole breast and for each breast composition were high, suggesting that this method is clinically useful.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.