Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40225491›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Artificial Intelligence System for Automatic Mammary Region Extraction Using Semi-subjective Corrected Region for Breast Composition Evaluation.

Sachi Ishizuka, Chiharu Kai, Tsunehiro Ohtsuka, Hitoshi Futamura, Naoki Kodama, Satoshi Kasai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sachi IshizukaGraduate School of Health and Welfare, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, Niigata, JPN.
Chiharu KaiDepartment of Radiological Technology, Faculty of Medical Technology, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, Niigata, JPN.
Tsunehiro OhtsukaDepartment of Breast Surgery, Ohtsuka Breastcare Clinic, Tokyo, JPN.
Hitoshi FutamuraDepartment of Breast Imaging, Konica Minolta, Inc., Tokyo, JPN.
Naoki KodamaDepartment of Radiological Technology, Faculty of Medical Technology, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, Niigata, JPN.
Satoshi KasaiDepartment of Radiological Technology, Faculty of Medical Technology, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, Niigata, JPN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Recently, breast composition has been used as a clinical indicator for breast cancer. Although systems have been developed for objectively extracting mammary gland regions, relying on subjective judgment to identify correct mammary gland regions for breast composition can lead to significant inter-judgment variation. In this study, we automatically extracted mammary gland regions using semi-subjective corrected regions that extract only mammary gland regions while simultaneously determining quantitative regions and examining whether extracted results could be used clinically. Methods We used 670 mammograms (Pe-ru-ru, Canon Medical Systems Corporation, Tochigi, Japan). A breast physician with 30 years of experience reading mammograms subjectively evaluated mammary gland regions based on the quantitatively determined regions. We defined these images as semi-subjective corrected region images. Further, we used U-Net for segmentation and the dice coefficient as the evaluation index for the region extraction accuracy. The parameters of U-Net (number of downsampling layers, learning rate, and batch size) and the orientation of input images were changed to improve accuracy. In addition, we calculated the dice coefficient based on the breast composition type to evaluate the clinical usefulness of this study. Results The average dice coefficient with the highest accuracy was 0.882; the average dice coefficients were 0.992, 0.832, 0.904, and 0.943 for fatty, scattered, heterogeneous dense, and extremely dense regions, respectively. Conclusion The mammary gland region was automatically extracted using semi-subjective corrected region images. The average dice coefficients for the whole breast and for each breast composition were high, suggesting that this method is clinically useful.

Indexed as

artificial intelligence (ai)breast compositionmammary gland regionsmammogramsemi-subjective corrected regions

Identifiers

PMID40225491
PMCPMC11993845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.