ArticleCureus2025
Older Adult Perspectives on Integrative Pain Management, Analgesics and Educational Preferences.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Myofascial pain in older adults: a geroscience-informed framework integrating precision geriatrics and digital therapeutics.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Older adults' (adults over age 50) preferences for educational programs on integrative pain management have not been adequately explored. Integrative pain management uses a holistic approach combining traditional medical treatments with alternative non-pharmacological practices. Pain-related education targeting older adults is supported by prior research, but to our knowledge older adult perspectives and learning preferences have not been investigated. Our objective was to explore older adult views on integrative pain management, specifically their educational needs and preferences, for patient-centered pain management education. Patients >50 years of age with chronic pain (pain for three months or longer), were eligible for enrollment in virtual focus groups. Audio recordings were transcribed, coded, and analyzed via a mixed inductive-deductive framework approach using ATLAS.ti version 23.0.8.0 (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA). Descriptive statistics were performed using Stata 16 (StataCorp., College Station, TX, USA). There were 16 participants and five themes generated: opioid/analgesic perceptions, integrative pain management, patient-provider relationship, and educational needs/preferences. All participants felt traditional interactions with healthcare providers did not adequately address their educational needs. There were discordant views on opioids, some noted positive impacts on pain and function and others feared addiction and side effects. Subthemes on the patient-provider relationship were identified including misalignment in treatment preferences/goals and communication gaps. Participants preferred virtual programs, incorporating demonstrations, audience interaction, and physical materials. These findings can be used to develop patient-centered educational programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.