Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40225442›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Influence of Social Media Filters on Plastic Surgery: A Surgeon's Perspective on Evolving Patient Demands.

Eduardo Miguel Veras, Samuel Román Ledesma, Joel Andres Acosta Matos, Manuel Emilio Castillo Cortorreal, Ilyana Goncharova, Rafael B Rivera Bonilla, Andreina Rosario Rosario, Manuel De Jesus Encarnación Ramirez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Eduardo Miguel VerasPlastic Surgery, Centro Medico Monumental, Santo Domingo, DOM.
Samuel Román LedesmaSurgery, Hospital Casa do Portugal, Río de Janeiro, BRA.
Joel Andres Acosta MatosPlastic Surgery, Dr. Oswaldo de Castro, São Paulo, BRA.
Manuel Emilio Castillo CortorrealSurgery, Hospital Casa do Portugal, Río de Janeiro, BRA.
Ilyana GoncharovaPlastic Surgery, Heartman Clinic, Moscow, RUS.
Rafael B Rivera BonillaPlastic Surgery, Centro de Cirugía Plástica y Lipoescultura (CECILIP), Santo Domingo, DOM.
Andreina Rosario RosarioMedical School, Autonomous University of Santo Domingo, Santo Domingo, DOM.
Manuel De Jesus Encarnación RamirezNeurosurgery, Russian People's Friendship University, Moscow, RUS.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSocial media filters have significantly influenced contemporary beauty standards, leading to a surge in patients seeking plastic surgery to emulate these digitally altered appearances. Platforms like Instagram and TikTok are primary drivers of this trend, creating unrealistic expectations among patients who desire outcomes that mimic their filtered images. MATERIAL AND

methodsA survey conducted from June to August 2024 via Google Forms targeted plastic surgeons across various regions. The survey aimed to understand how social media filters impact patient requests and surgeon practices, collecting data on demographics, professional backgrounds, and patient outcomes.  Results: The survey, with 68 responses, revealed that social media filters are frequently referenced during consultations, influencing patient expectations and increasing the prevalence of revision surgeries. Surgeons reported significant ethical concerns and noted higher rates of psychological conditions such as body dysmorphic disorder among these patients.

conclusionSocial media filters have reshaped patient demands in plastic surgery, necessitating ethical considerations and professional adaptations. Surgeons must balance patient desires with realistic outcomes, emphasizing education and psychological screening to address the challenges posed by this trend.

Indexed as

body dysphorialips surgeryplastic surgerypositive social mediasocial media

Identifiers

PMID40225442
PMCPMC11991445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.