ArticleOphthalmology science
Modeling Patterns of Medication Adherence in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma.
Article in Ophthalmology science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: To use group-based trajectory modeling to identify patterns of medication adherence in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and to identify factors associated with each pattern. Design: Prospective cohort study. Participants: Seventy-two patients with POAG who were enrolled in a National Institutes of Health-funded progression study at the University of Alabama at Birmingham were included in this study. Patients were required to be >18 years of age, have a diagnosis of POAG, and be prescribed hypotensive eye drops to treat their glaucoma. Methods: Fifty-two weeks of mean weekly medication adherence data were collected using Medication Event Monitoring Systems. Group-based trajectory modeling was used to estimate models with 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 medication adherence trajectory groups. Self-reported race and illness perception were included as covariates. The model with the lowest Bayesian information criterion (which provides a measure of the trade-off between model fit and model complexity) and the highest number of clinically relevant trajectory groups was deemed optimal. Main Outcome Measures: Medication adherence trajectory groups. Results: The Bayesian information criterion was -1041.1 for the 2-group model, -755.9 for the 3-group model, -643.8 for the 4-group model, -590.4 for the 5-group model, and -559.0 for the 6-group model. We identified the 4-group model as the most optimal. The 4 trajectory groups estimated by this model were near-perfect adherence (51.8% of participants), good adherence (23.2% of participants), declining adherence (18.1% of participants), and poor adherence (6.9% of participants). Compared with the poor adherence group, a higher illness perception score predicted a lower probability of membership in the good (B = -0.276, Conclusions: Medication adherence is an important clinical outcome that is associated with disease severity and disease progression in POAG. Further investigation of this important topic may reveal other shared clinical characteristics that can be used to identify patients who may be at risk for adverse clinical outcomes such as glaucoma progression. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.