ReviewKidney international reports2025
Navigating Genetic Testing in Nephrology: Options and Decision-Making Strategies.
Review in Kidney international reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genetic Evaluation Practices in Living Kidney Donor Candidates.Kidney international reports · 2026Article
- Genetic insights into congenital and infantile nephrotic syndrome: predicting severity and informing care.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Technological advances such as next-generation sequencing (NGS) have enabled high-throughput assessment of the human genome, supporting the usage of genetic testing as a first-line tool across clinical medicine. Although individually rare, genetic causes account for end-stage renal disease in 10% to 15% of adults and 70% of children, and in many of these individuals, genetic testing can identify a specific etiology and meaningfully impact management. However, with numerous options for genetic testing available, nephrologists may feel uncomfortable integrating genetics into their clinical practice. Here, we aim to demystify the process of genetic test selection and highlight the opportunities for interdisciplinary collaboration between nephrologists and genetics professionals, thereby supporting precision medicine for patients with kidney disease. We first detail the various clinical genetic testing modalities, highlighting their technical advantages and limitations, and then discuss indications for their usage. Next, we provide a generalized workflow for genetic test selection among individuals with kidney disease and illustrate how this workflow can be applied to genetic test selection across diverse clinical contexts. We then discuss key areas related to the usage of genetic testing in clinical nephrology that merit further research and approaches to investigate them.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.