Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40225371›Full record

ArticleKidney international reports2025

Systematic Scoping Review of Socioeconomic Burden and Associated Psychosocial Impact in Patients With Rare Kidney Diseases and Their Caregivers.

Anna Palagyi, Agnivo Sengupta, Monica Moorthy, Charu Malik, Jonathan Barratt, Olivier Devuyst, Ifeoma I Ulasi, Daniel P Gale, Siyuan Wang, Blake Angell and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Kidney international reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Anna PalagyiThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Agnivo SenguptaThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Monica MoorthyInternational Society of Nephrology, Brussels, Belgium.
Charu MalikInternational Society of Nephrology, Brussels, Belgium.
Jonathan BarrattDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Olivier DevuystDepartment of Physiology, Mechanisms of Inherited Kidney Disorders, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Ifeoma I UlasiRenal Unit, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Nigeria, Ituku-Ozalla, Enugu, Nigeria.
Daniel P GaleNational Registry of Rare Kidney Diseases, Bristol, UK.
Siyuan WangThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Blake AngellThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Vivekanand JhaInternational Society of Nephrology, Brussels, Belgium.
Stephen JanThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Rare kidney diseases constitute a significant public health challenge but have attracted limited research investment. The evidence about the socioeconomic burden of rare kidney diseases has not been systematically examined. Such evidence is critical for generating the advocacy and awareness necessary to impel scientific and policy investment in targeted care in health systems worldwide. We aimed to evaluate the socioeconomic burden borne by patients with rare kidney diseases, their families, and caregivers, and the related psychosocial impact. Methods: We undertook a systemic scoping review of the recent evidence of the socioeconomic and psychosocial burden of rare kidney diseases, to identify gaps in the understanding of this burden across contexts and factors influencing them. Three databases and the grey literature were searched for relevant studies published in the 10 years before April 30, 2023. Results: Fifty-three articles met the inclusion criteria; one-quarter of these articles included rare disease cohorts in which the kidney was the primary organ affected, and 91% of studies were conducted in high-income countries. Evidence of substantial life-long socioeconomic burden emerged across the following 4 main categories: education ( Conclusion: Significant gaps in our understanding of the socioeconomic burden remain, particularly in lower-resource health systems, among traditionally marginalized populations, and for rare diseases for which kidney is the primary affected organ. Further exploration of socioeconomic burden within these populations is vital to inform effectively targeted investment in advocacy and health care innovation for affected individuals.

Indexed as

educationlost productivityrare kidney diseasesscoping reviewsocioeconomic burden

Identifiers

PMID40225371
PMCPMC11993207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.