ArticleIranian journal of biotechnology2024
Article in Iranian journal of biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI-driven neoantigen identification: a comprehensive review from somatic variant calling to T cell recognition.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- SiaScoreNet: a siamese neural network-based model integrating prediction scores for HLA-peptide interaction prediction.Bioinformatics advances · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Human leukocyte antigens (HLAs) play a pivotal role in orchestrating the host's immune response, offering a promising avenue with reduced adverse effects compared to conventional treatments. Cancer immunotherapies use HLA class I molecules for T cells to recognize tumor antigens, emphasizing the importance of identifying peptides that bind effectively to HLAs. Computer modeling of HLA-peptide binding speeds up the search for immunogenic epitopes, which enhances the prospect of personalized medicine and targeted therapies. The Immune Epitope Database (IEDB) is a vital repository, housing curated immune epitope data and prediction tools for HLA-peptide binding. It can be challenging for immunologists to choose the best tool from the IEDB for predicting HLA-peptide binding. This has led to the creation of consensus-based methods that combine the results of several predictors. One of the major challenges in these methods is how to effectively integrate the results from multiple predictors. Objectives: Previous consensus-based methods integrate at most three tools by relying on simple strategies, such as selecting prediction methods based on their proximity to HLA in training data. In this study, we introduce HLAPepBinder, a novel consensus approach using ensemble machine learning methods to predict HLA-peptide binding, addressing the challenges biologists face in model selection. Materials and Methods: The key contribution is the development of an automatic pipeline named Results: Conclusion: Our study introduces a novel ensemble-learning model designed to enhance the accuracy and efficiency of HLA-peptide binding predictions. Due to the lack of reliable negative data and the typical assumption of unknown interactions being negative, we focus on analyzing the unknown HLA-peptide bindings in the test set that our model predicts with 100% certainty as positive bindings. Using
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.