ArticleScientifica2025
Enset Landraces: Conservation, Distribution, and Use in an Enset-Based Agricultural System.
Article in Scientifica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Soil fertility improvement through Enset-based farming systems in central Ethiopia.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Enset is a unique food security crop for more than 25% of the population in Ethiopia and serves as a food, animal feed, medicine, and fiber source, with significant resilience and environmental adaptability. Enset growing zones harbor several landraces, resulting from differences in natural selection, human selection, and cultural management practices. Understanding landrace propagation, selection, and in situ conservation practices is crucial. These practices are essential for crop improvement, management, conservation, and enhancement of genetic resources. This study investigates the utilization and in situ conservation practices of enset landraces and draws insights from farmers and agricultural experts through in-depth interviews, surveys, group discussions, and field observations. Representatives from the enset-growing areas of Hadiya, Gedeo, Gurage, and Kembata Tembaro zones and Basketo Special Woreda were selected due to their diverse sociocultural practices, geographic landscapes and distribution, altitude variations, enset farming systems, and rainfall patterns. Purposive sampling was employed to select 19 representatives from woredas based on traditional enset culture practices. Subsequently, 31 kebeles were chosen based on their altitude differences. A total of 406 household units were then selected. The relative density determined the abundance of individual landraces. The distribution and richness of landraces across sites were analyzed using Simpson's diversity, Shannon-Wiener, and Margalef's indices. A total of 274 vernacular names for enset landraces were recorded, but only 106 (39%) were cultivated in the sampled households. Despite this, analysis of diversity indices (Shannon-Wiener, Simpson, and Margalef) revealed no significant differences between the study sites. The analysis also revealed moderate to high enset landrace diversity across the studied sites. The study highlights a rich and diverse collection of landraces adapted to various ecological conditions and fulfilling various purposes (food, feed, fiber, and medicine). Notably, food value emerged as the primary driver of landrace selection and abundance. Promoting sustainable enset agriculture should, therefore, prioritize maintaining landrace diversity and supporting traditional knowledge to enhance resilience and food security.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.