Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40225272›Full record

ArticleWellcome open research2024

From smoking cessation to physical activity: Can ontology-based methods for automated evidence synthesis generalise across behaviour change domains?

Oscar Castro, Emma Norris, Alison J Wright, Emily Hayes, Ella Howes, Candice Moore, Robert West, Susan Michie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Wellcome open research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Oscar CastroCentre for Behaviour Change, University College London, London, England, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5332-3557
Emma NorrisHealth Behaviour Change Research Group, Department of Health Sciences, Brunel University London, London, England, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9957-4025
Alison J WrightCentre for Behaviour Change, University College London, London, England, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0373-5219
Emily HayesCentre for Behaviour Change, University College London, London, England, UK.
Ella HowesCentre for Behaviour Change, University College London, London, England, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8488-1073
Candice MooreCentre for Behaviour Change, University College London, London, England, UK.
Robert WestDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, England, UK.
Susan MichieCentre for Behaviour Change, University College London, London, England, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0063-6378

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Developing behaviour change interventions able to tackle major challenges such as non-communicable diseases or climate change requires effective and efficient use of scientific evidence. The Human Behaviour-Change Project (HBCP) aims to improve evidence synthesis in behavioural science by compiling intervention reports and annotating them with an ontology to train information extraction and prediction algorithms. The HBCP used smoking cessation as the first 'proof of concept' domain but intends to extend its methodology to other behaviours. The aims of this paper are to (i) assess the extent to which methods developed for annotating smoking cessation intervention reports were generalisable to a corpus of physical activity evidence, and (ii) describe the steps involved in developing this second HBCP corpus. Methods: The development of the physical activity corpus involved: (i) reviewing the suitability of smoking cessation codes already used in the HBCP, (ii) defining the selection criteria and scope, (iii) identifying and screening records for inclusion, and (iv) annotating intervention reports using a code set of 200+ entities from the Behaviour Change Intervention Ontology. Results: Stage 1 highlighted the need to modify the smoking cessation behavioural outcome codes for application to physical activity. One hundred physical activity intervention reports were reviewed, and 11 physical activity experts were consulted to inform the adapted code set. Stage 2 involved narrowing down the scope of the corpus to interventions targeting moderate-to-vigorous physical activity. In stage 3, 111 physical activity intervention reports were identified, which were then annotated in stage 4. Conclusions: Smoking cessation annotation methods developed as part of the HBCP were mostly transferable to the physical activity domain. However, the codes applied to behavioural outcome variables required adaptations. This paper can help anyone interested in building a body of research to develop automated evidence synthesis methods in physical activity or for other behaviours.

Indexed as

classification systemevidence synthesis automationexercisemovement behavioursontologysystematic reviewtaxonomy

Identifiers

PMID40225272
PMCPMC11992510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.